Arizona Homes and Real Estate - Sale prices
Arizona homes for sale
  Home     Privacy     Unsubscribing     Data     Testimonials     About     John Wake
Feel free to link to this page

From the Hotline
by Christopher A. Combs
Copyright 2004, all rights reserved. The following is for informational purposes only and is not intended as definitive legal or tax advice. You should not act upon this information without seeking independent legal counsel. If you desire legal, tax or other professional advice, please contact your attorney, tax advisor or other professional consultant.


Buyer can assign equitable interest in contract unless expressly prohibited

Question: During the escrow period the Buyer assigns the Contract to a third party. The Seller is threatening to cancel the Contract because of this assignment unless a higher price is negotiated. Can the Seller cancel the Contract because of the assignment of the Contract by the Buyer to a third party?

Answer: No. A general rule of law is that any contract can be assigned, unless the contract prohibits assignment. Restatement (Second) of Contracts, §317 (1981). Although a contract can be assigned, the party assigning the contract remains liable on the contract. Therefore, the Buyer can assign the Contract, but if the third party fails to perform under the Contract, the Buyer will be required to perform under the Contract. Note: All AAR Contracts permit assignment of the contract. Therefore, if the Seller wants to prohibit the assignment of the contract, specific language will have to be added to the contract.


Phoenix attorney Christopher A. Combs is a partner with the firm of Combs Law Group, P.C. Reprinted with permission from Arizona Realtor Digest, 2004.


Search HomeSaleNews.com - Real estate info

Google
 
Web HomeSaleNews.com

Other columns from Arizona real estate attorney Christopher A. Combs